BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:959824fa4094be9814190eb615fb522f
CATEGORIES:Lecture / Reading / Talk
CREATED:20211120T121113
SUMMARY:“FROM ‘NONALIGNMENT’ TO THE ‘MODI DOCTRINE’: THE INDIAN WORLDVIEW IN TRANSFORMATION” - A Talk by Dr. Atul Sharma
LOCATION:Chanakya II Lecture Theatre\, FLAME University
DESCRIPTION:\n\nDEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES \n invites you to a talk by \n\n\nDR. ATU
 L MISHRA\n School of International Studies, Central University of Gujrat, G
 andhinagar\n\n\n “FROM ‘NONALIGNMENT’ TO THE ‘MODI DOCTRINE’: THE INDIAN WO
 RLDVIEW IN TRANSFORMATION”\n\n\nDr. Atul Mishra is Assistant Professor in I
 nternational Politics at the School of International Studies, Central Unive
 rsity of Gujrat, Gandhinagar, where he has been teaching International Rela
 tions Theory, Indian Foreign Policy, and Indian Government and Politics sin
 ce 2010. His doctoral thesis, undertaken at the International Politics Divi
 sion, Centre for International Politics, Organization and Disarmament, at J
 awaharlal Nehru University examined post-partition ideas and practices of s
 overeignty in India and Pakistan. Dr. Mishra’s published theoretical resear
 ch has been on state formation in South Asia. Dr. Mishra has, along with Pr
 of. Rajesh Rajagopalan co-authored a Handbook on Nuclear South Asia, and is
  preparing a book manuscript on “The Sovereign Lives of India and Pakistan”
  for the Oxford University Press. Currently engaged in an ICSSR sponsored c
 ollaborative study of India’s regional relations, he is also working on dev
 eloping a social theory of international relations of South Asia. Dr. Mishr
 a writes occasionally for newspapers like Dawn (Pakistan) and The Hindu (In
 dia).\n\n\nThis talk will outline the deep transformation of India’s worldv
 iew spanning the past three decades and still ongoing. Nonalignment, in its
  Nehruvian conceptualization, was a sophisticated and strategically nuanced
  Indian worldview that sought to combine the goals of transcending and tran
 sforming the international order. It substantively governed India’s foreign
  policy until the early-1960s. With Nehru’s death, and in the face of newer
  international political and security challenges, India abandoned nonalignm
 ent in practice while continuing to pay lip-service to it, using it to seek
  international status and influence. Dr. Mishra will argue that since the m
 id-1980s, a parallel development has unfolded. Alongside expressions of com
 mitment to nonalignment, there has been a long, gradual and thoroughgoing r
 evision of the Indian worldview. A further development in this process has 
 been the emergence of two divergent strands of thinking on India’s engageme
 nt with the world: a Liberal strand, which builds upon elements of Nehruvia
 nism and Liberalism within the Indian polity, and an amalgam of ideas calle
 d the ‘Modi Doctrine’, which traces its lineage to the international thinki
 ng within Political Hinduism. The elements of order shaping and the pursuit
  of wealth, power and status remain common to both strands, but they also d
 iffer in crucial ways. The talk will highlight their differences, focusing 
 especially on the features and limitations of the ‘Modi Doctrine’.\n
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<br/><br/>DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES <br/> invites you to a talk by <br/
 ><br/><br/>DR. ATUL MISHRA<br/> School of International Studies, Central Un
 iversity of Gujrat, Gandhinagar<br/><br/><br/> “FROM ‘NONALIGNMENT’ TO THE 
 ‘MODI DOCTRINE’: THE INDIAN WORLDVIEW IN TRANSFORMATION”<br/><br/><br/>Dr. 
 Atul Mishra is Assistant Professor in International Politics at the School 
 of International Studies, Central University of Gujrat, Gandhinagar, where 
 he has been teaching International Relations Theory, Indian Foreign Policy,
  and Indian Government and Politics since 2010. His doctoral thesis, undert
 aken at the International Politics Division, Centre for International Polit
 ics, Organization and Disarmament, at Jawaharlal Nehru University examined 
 post-partition ideas and practices of sovereignty in India and Pakistan. Dr
 . Mishra’s published theoretical research has been on state formation in So
 uth Asia. Dr. Mishra has, along with Prof. Rajesh Rajagopalan co-authored a
  Handbook on Nuclear South Asia, and is preparing a book manuscript on “The
  Sovereign Lives of India and Pakistan” for the Oxford University Press. Cu
 rrently engaged in an ICSSR sponsored collaborative study of India’s region
 al relations, he is also working on developing a social theory of internati
 onal relations of South Asia. Dr. Mishra writes occasionally for newspapers
  like Dawn (Pakistan) and The Hindu (India).<br/><br/><br/>This talk will o
 utline the deep transformation of India’s worldview spanning the past three
  decades and still ongoing. Nonalignment, in its Nehruvian conceptualizatio
 n, was a sophisticated and strategically nuanced Indian worldview that soug
 ht to combine the goals of transcending and transforming the international 
 order. It substantively governed India’s foreign policy until the early-196
 0s. With Nehru’s death, and in the face of newer international political an
 d security challenges, India abandoned nonalignment in practice while conti
 nuing to pay lip-service to it, using it to seek international status and i
 nfluence. Dr. Mishra will argue that since the mid-1980s, a parallel develo
 pment has unfolded. Alongside expressions of commitment to nonalignment, th
 ere has been a long, gradual and thoroughgoing revision of the Indian world
 view. A further development in this process has been the emergence of two d
 ivergent strands of thinking on India’s engagement with the world: a Libera
 l strand, which builds upon elements of Nehruvianism and Liberalism within 
 the Indian polity, and an amalgam of ideas called the ‘Modi Doctrine’, whic
 h traces its lineage to the international thinking within Political Hinduis
 m. The elements of order shaping and the pursuit of wealth, power and statu
 s remain common to both strands, but they also differ in crucial ways. The 
 talk will highlight their differences, focusing especially on the features 
 and limitations of the ‘Modi Doctrine’.<br/>
DTSTAMP:20261030T232613
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20161014T090000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20161014T103000
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR